1/28/2024 0 Comments Photoninja video![]() ![]() I did not dismiss LR 4 because it´s Clarity feature sucked. Still the RAW engine is great in my opinion. My opinion is nothing to do with "skimping" - the simple fact is that it's not worth the price, which is a different thing altogether. When PN can recover highlights properly I might have another look. I shoot in this sort of challenging light all the time, and handling images like this in Lr is trivially easy. This is the best PN could do (and don't anyone even think of suggesting I need to learn to use PN. ![]() I'm obviously not clever enough to see into the future so that I can temper my opinion of a piece of software now with the knowledge of what it will be like at version 4.īut - "picture saying more than 1000 words" and all that - here's my main problem with PN: Make excuses for its failings if you like, but they're still failings. I pushed the sliders for hours on that image in LR and i did not get the same level of details (at the same noise level) i get instantly with photo ninja.Īnd if we were discussing Lr v1.0 I'd have made similar comments about Lightroom too.īut we're not: we were asked to express an opinion about Photo Ninja. Im using LR for some time (3 years i think) but if there isn´t something i missed, then i can´t get the same detail rendering in LR. yes the workflow needs some work.īut the image quality is already better then lightrooms in MANY cases. I wanted to like it (I much prefer converters that are just converters) but PN fails on a number of very important points for me. Suffice to say, I've maxed out the (only!) 15 day trial period, and Picturecode isn't getting my money.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |